On 02/05/2013 05:04 PM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 11:16 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm not sure if the problem is with FreeBSD or ZFS or both so I cross-post
>> (I known it's bad).
>>
>> Well I've server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don't count / on differents
>> disks) zfs po
On 01/31/2013 11:16 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure if the problem is with FreeBSD or ZFS or both so I cross-post
> (I known it's bad).
>
> Well I've server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don't count / on differents
> disks) zfs pool with 36 disk.
>
> The performance is very very g
Le 04/02/2013 ? 11:21:12-0500, Paul Kraus a écrit
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
>
> > Well I've server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don't count / on
> > differents disks) zfs pool with 36 disk.
> >
> > The performance is very very good on the server.
> >
> > I've one NFS client
On Jan 31, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Albert Shih wrote:
> Well I've server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don't count / on differents
> disks) zfs pool with 36 disk.
>
> The performance is very very good on the server.
>
> I've one NFS client running FreeBSD 8.3 and the performance over NFS is
> very good :
Hi all,
I'm not sure if the problem is with FreeBSD or ZFS or both so I cross-post
(I known it's bad).
Well I've server running FreeBSD 9.0 with (don't count / on differents
disks) zfs pool with 36 disk.
The performance is very very good on the server.
I've one NFS client running FreeBSD 8.3 a
