On 05/27/10 05:16 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I just tried this with a UFS based filesystem just for a lark.
It never failed on UFS, regardless of the contents of /etc/dfs/dfstab.
Guess I must now try this with a ZFS fs under that iso file.
Just tried it again with b134 *with* "share /mnt" i
>> FWIW (even on a freshly booted system after a panic)
>> # lofiadm zyzzy.iso /dev/lofi/1
>> # mount -F hsfs /dev/lofi/1 /mnt
>> mount: /dev/lofi/1 is already mounted or /mnt is busy
>> # mount -O -F hsfs /dev/lofi/1 /mnt
>> # share /mnt
>> #
>>
>> If you unshare /mnt and then do this aga
On 5/27/2010 12:21 PM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
Jan Kryl wrote:
the bug (6798273) has been closed as incomplete with following
note:
"I cannot reproduce any issue with the given testcase on b137."
So you should test this with b137 or newer build. There have
been some extensive changes going to tre
Jan Kryl wrote:
the bug (6798273) has been closed as incomplete with following
note:
"I cannot reproduce any issue with the given testcase on b137."
So you should test this with b137 or newer build. There have
been some extensive changes going to treeclimb_* functions,
so the bug is probably fi
On 5/27/2010 2:45 PM, Jan Kryl wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On 24/05/10 16:52 -0400, Frank Middleton wrote:
>
>> Many many moons ago, I submitted a CR into bugs about a
>> highly reproducible panic that occurs if you try to re-share
>> a lofi mounted image. That CR has AFAIK long since
>> disappe
Hi Frank,
On 24/05/10 16:52 -0400, Frank Middleton wrote:
> Many many moons ago, I submitted a CR into bugs about a
> highly reproducible panic that occurs if you try to re-share
> a lofi mounted image. That CR has AFAIK long since
> disappeared - I even forget what it was called.
>
> This
Many many moons ago, I submitted a CR into bugs about a
highly reproducible panic that occurs if you try to re-share
a lofi mounted image. That CR has AFAIK long since
disappeared - I even forget what it was called.
This server is used for doing network installs. Let's say
you have a 64 bit iso