Re: [zfs-discuss] xVm blockers!

2007-11-28 Thread Kugutsumen
ok cc'ing the zfs discuss was probably a mistake. However I don't like the way you troll me and single out point 4, while the other 3 points are directly related to Xen. point 1, I can't set migrate a xen domU from a linux dom0 because it is impossible to keep the previous network configuration

Re: [zfs-discuss] xVm blockers!

2007-11-28 Thread Darren J Moffat
K wrote: > 4/ Poor exploit mitigation under Solaris. In comparaison, OpenBSD, > grsec linux and Windows => XP SP2 have really good exploit > mitigation It is a shame because solaris offered a non-exec stack > before nearly everyone else... but it stopped there... no heap > protection, e

[zfs-discuss] xVm blockers!

2007-11-28 Thread K
1/ Anchor vNic, the equivalent of linux dummy interfaces, we need more flexibility in the way we setup xen networking. What is sad is that the code is already available in the unreleased crossbow bits... but it won't appear in nevada until Q1 2008 :( This is a real blocker for me as my ISP