Moore, Joe wrote:
> Richard Elling wrote:
>
>> There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
>> want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs,
>> and SunAlerts
>> for the platform.
>> http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Sy
>> stems/Su
Richard Elling wrote:
> There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
> want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs,
> and SunAlerts
> for the platform.
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Sy
> stems/SunFireX4500/SunFireX4500
>
> Yo
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:38:21PM -0700, Neal Pollack wrote:
>
> As of build 94, it does not automatically bring the disk online.
> I replaced a failed disk on an x4500 today running Nevada build 94, and
> still
> had to manually issue
>
> # cfgadm -c configure sata1/3
> # zpool replace tank cx
Lida Horn wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs, and SunAlerts
for the platform.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/SunFireX4500/SunFireX450
Richard Elling wrote:
> There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
> want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs, and SunAlerts
> for the platform.
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/SunFireX4500/SunFireX4500
>
> You will
Since we were drowning, we decided to go ahead and reboot with my
guesses, even though I have not heard and expert opinions on the
changes. (Also, 3 mins was way under estimated. It takes 12 minutes to
reboot our x4500).
The new values are: (original)
set bufhwm_pct=10(2%)
set m
> Yup, and the Supermicro card uses the "Marvell
> Hercules-2 88SX6081 (Rev. C0) SATA Host Controller",
> which is part of the series supported by the same
> driver:
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/marvell88sx
> 7d?a=view. I've seen the Supermicro card mentioned
> in connection with t
> Ross,
>
> The X4500 uses 6x Marvell 88SX SATA controllers for
> its internal disks. They are not Supermicro
> controllers. The new X4540 uses an LSI chipset
> instead of the Marvell chipset.
>
> --Brett
Yup, and the Supermicro card uses the "Marvell Hercules-2 88SX6081 (Rev. C0)
SATA Host C
Ross,
The X4500 uses 6x Marvell 88SX SATA controllers for its internal disks. They
are not Supermicro controllers. The new X4540 uses an LSI chipset instead of
the Marvell chipset.
--Brett
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss
There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs, and SunAlerts
for the platform.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/SunFireX4500/SunFireX4500
You will want to especially pay attention
Have any of you guys reported this to Sun? A quick search of the bug database
doesn't bring up anything that appears related to sata drives and hanging or
hot swapping.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discu
2008 7:40 AM
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 performance tuning.
We have had a disk fail in the the existing x4500 and it sure froze the
whole server. I believe it is an OS problem which (should have) been
fixed in a version newer than we have. If you want me to tes
We have had a disk fail in the the existing x4500 and it sure froze the
whole server. I believe it is an OS problem which (should have) been
fixed in a version newer than we have. If you want me to test it on the
new x4500 because it runs Sol10 508 I can do.
Ross wrote:
> Hi Jorgen,
>
> This
Hi Jorgen,
This isn't an answer to your problem I'm afraid, but a request for you to do a
test when you get your new x4500.
Could you try pulling a SATA drive to see if the system hangs? I'm finding
Solaris just locks up if I pull a drive connected to the Supermicro
AOC-SAT2-MV8 card, and I w
>> SunOS x4500-01.unix 5.11 snv_70b i86pc i386 i86pc
> That's a very old release, have you considered upgrading?
> Ian.
>
It was the absolute latest version available when we received the x4500,
and now it is live and supporting a large number of customers. However,
the 2nd unit will arrive nex
Jorgen Lundman writes:
>
> We are having slow performance with the UFS volumes on the x4500. They
> are slow even on the local server. Which makes me think it is (for once)
> not NFS related.
>
>
> Current settings:
>
> SunOS x4500-01.unix 5.11 snv_70b i86pc i386 i86pc
>
That's a very ol
We are having slow performance with the UFS volumes on the x4500. They
are slow even on the local server. Which makes me think it is (for once)
not NFS related.
Current settings:
SunOS x4500-01.unix 5.11 snv_70b i86pc i386 i86pc
# cat /etc/release
Solaris Express Developer Ed
17 matches
Mail list logo
