On 10/31/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Cyril,
Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 8:30:50 AM, you wrote:
CP> On 10/30/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 1. rebooting server could take several hours right now with so many file
system
>>
>>I belive this p
Hello Cyril,
Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 8:30:50 AM, you wrote:
CP> On 10/30/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 1. rebooting server could take several hours right now with so many file
>> system
>>
>>I belive this problem is being addressed right now
CP> Well, I've done
Erblichs writes:
> Hi,
>
> My suggestion is direct any command output to a file
> that may print thous of lines.
>
> I have not tried that number of FSs. So, my first
> suggestion is to have alot of phys mem installed.
I seem to recall 64K per FS and being worked on t
On 10/30/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. rebooting server could take several hours right now with so many file system
I belive this problem is being addressed right now
Well, I've done a quick test on b50 - 10K filesystems took around 5 minutes
to boot. Not bad, conside
Hi,
My suggestion is direct any command output to a file
that may print thous of lines.
I have not tried that number of FSs. So, my first
suggestion is to have alot of phys mem installed.
The second item that I could be concerned with is
path tran
Hello Rafael,
Monday, October 30, 2006, 2:58:56 PM, you wrote:
>
Hi,
An IT organization needs to implement highly available file server, using Solaris 10, SunCluster, NFS and Samba. We are talking about thousands, even 10s of thousands of ZFS file systems.
Is this doable? Should I expe
Hi,
An IT organization needs to implement highly available file server,
using Solaris 10, SunCluster, NFS and Samba. We are talking about
thousands, even 10s of thousands of ZFS file systems.
Is this doable? Should I expect any impact on performance or stability
due to the fact I'll have that
