Re: [zfs-discuss] strange results ...

2009-10-22 Thread Robert Milkowski
Jens Elkner wrote: Hmmm, wondering about IMHO strange ZFS results ... X4440: 4x6 2.8GHz cores (Opteron 8439 SE), 64 GB RAM 6x Sun STK RAID INT V1.0 (Hitachi H103012SCSUN146G SAS) Nevada b124 Started with a simple test using zfs on c1t0d0s0: cd /var/tmp (1) time sh -c 'mkfile

Re: [zfs-discuss] strange results ...

2009-10-22 Thread Marion Hakanson
jel+...@cs.uni-magdeburg.de said: > 2nd) Never had a Sun STK RAID INT before. Actually my intention was to create > a zpool mirror of sd0 and sd1 for boot and logs, and a 2x2-way zpool mirror > with the 4 remaining disks. However, the controller seems not to support > JBODs :( - which is also bad,

[zfs-discuss] strange results ...

2009-10-21 Thread Jens Elkner
Hmmm, wondering about IMHO strange ZFS results ... X4440: 4x6 2.8GHz cores (Opteron 8439 SE), 64 GB RAM 6x Sun STK RAID INT V1.0 (Hitachi H103012SCSUN146G SAS) Nevada b124 Started with a simple test using zfs on c1t0d0s0: cd /var/tmp (1) time sh -c 'mkfile 32g bla ; sync' 0.16