Re: [zfs-discuss] some ZFS issues

2007-11-27 Thread croorg
> What do *you* mean by flexible in this context ? > ZFS Crypto is by design extensible to new crypto algorithms and modes. > It is also designed to allow for multiple different key management > strategies and implementations, and in fact is explicitly a multiple > phase project for this reason

Re: [zfs-discuss] some ZFS issues

2007-11-27 Thread croorg
Thanks for your answers so far. > Yes the pools are properly dealt with on a reboot. > What makes you think > this wouldn't be the case ? Do you have a specific > case where you > believe it has failed ? Well, I have to admit I only played around a little bit with zfs-fuse so far. And I don'

Re: [zfs-discuss] some ZFS issues

2007-11-26 Thread Darren J Moffat
not available wrote: > But there are some points I have problems with: > - What happens to the pools if the machine is shut down and rebooted? Are the > pools automatically exported and imported again on boot up? Where is the > information about the pools kept? What component is responsible for a

Re: [zfs-discuss] some ZFS issues

2007-11-26 Thread Darren J Moffat
not available wrote: > - What about data wiping? Simply overriding does not work because of the COW > policy. So how can it be achieved? I think it should be considered to > integrate some mechanism to intentionally override data. See the archives of this list, there was a very long discussion a

[zfs-discuss] some ZFS issues

2007-11-26 Thread not available
Hello, I have read much about ZFS and I find it great, especially the checksums against silent data corruption and the COW writing policy and the snapshots and of course the storage pooling. But there are some points I have problems with: - What happens to the pools if the machine is shut down an