Hi,
Until it's fixed the 132 build should be used instead of the 133?
Bruno
On 25-2-2010 3:22, Bart Smaalders wrote:
> On 02/24/10 12:57, Bruno Sousa wrote:
>> Yes i'm using the mtp driver . In total this system has 3 HBA's, 1
>> internal (Dell perc), and 2 Sun non-raid HBA's.
>> I'm also using m
On 02/24/10 12:57, Bruno Sousa wrote:
Yes i'm using the mtp driver . In total this system has 3 HBA's, 1
internal (Dell perc), and 2 Sun non-raid HBA's.
I'm also using multipath, but if i disable multipath i have pretty much
the same results..
Bruno
From what I understand, the fix is expected
Yes i'm using the mtp driver . In total this system has 3 HBA's, 1
internal (Dell perc), and 2 Sun non-raid HBA's.
I'm also using multipath, but if i disable multipath i have pretty much
the same results..
Bruno
On 24-2-2010 19:42, Andy Bowers wrote:
> Hi Bart,
> yep, I got Bruno to run a
Hi Bart,
yep, I got Bruno to run a kernel profile lockstat...
it does look like the mpt issue..
andy
:---
Count indv cuml rcnt nsec Hottest CPU+PILCaller
2861 7% 55% 0.00
On 02/23/10 15:20, Chris Ridd wrote:
On 23 Feb 2010, at 19:53, Bruno Sousa wrote:
The system becames really slow during the data copy using network, but i copy
data between 2 pools of the box i don't notice that issue, so probably i may be
hitting some sort of interrupt conflit in the networ
Hi all,
I still didn't find the problem but it seems to be related with
interrupts sharing between onboard network cards (broadcom) and the
intel 10gbE card PCI-e.
Runing a simple iperf from a linux box to my zfs box, if i use bnx2 or
bnx3 i have a performance over 100 mbs, but if i use bnx0, bxn1
On 23 Feb 2010, at 19:53, Bruno Sousa wrote:
> The system becames really slow during the data copy using network, but i copy
> data between 2 pools of the box i don't notice that issue, so probably i may
> be hitting some sort of interrupt conflit in the network cards...This system
> is config
The system becames really slow during the data copy using network, but i
copy data between 2 pools of the box i don't notice that issue, so
probably i may be hitting some sort of interrupt conflit in the network
cards...This system is configured with *alot *of interfaces, being :
4 internal broadc
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Bruno Sousa wrote:
I don't have compression and deduplication enabled, but checksums are.
However disabling checksums gives a 0.5 load reduction only...
Since high CPU consumption is unusual, I would suspect a device driver
issue. Perhaps there is an interrupt conflict s
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Eugen Leitl wrote:
In terms of scaling, does zfs on OpenSolaris play well on multiple
cores? How much disks (assuming 100 MByte/s throughput for each)
would be considered pushing it for a current single-socket quadcore?
In any large storage system, most disks are relativel
Hi Bob,
I have neither deduplication or compression enabled. The checksum are
enabled, but if try to disable it i gain aroud 0.5 less load on the box,
so it still seems to be to much.
Bruno
On 23-2-2010 20:03, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Bruno Sousa wrote:
>> Could the fact of
Hi,
I don't have compression and deduplication enabled, but checksums are.
However disabling checksums gives a 0.5 load reduction only...
Bruno
On 23-2-2010 20:27, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:03:04PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
>
>> Zfs can consume appreciable CPU if c
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:03:04PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Zfs can consume appreciable CPU if compression, sha256 checksums,
> and/or deduplication is enabled. Otherwise, substantial CPU
> consumption is unexpected.
In terms of scaling, does zfs on OpenSolaris play well on multiple
cor
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Bruno Sousa wrote:
Could the fact of having a RAIDZ2 configuration be the cause for such a
big load on the zfs box, or maybe am i missing something ?
Zfs can consume appreciable CPU if compression, sha256 checksums,
and/or deduplication is enabled. Otherwise, substantial
Hi all,
I'm currently evaluating the possibility of migrating a NFS server
(Linux Centos 5.4 / RHEL 5.4 x64-32) based to a opensolaris box and i'm
seeing some huge cpu usage in the opensolaris box.
The zfs box is a Dell R710 with 2 Quad-Cores (Intel E5506 @ 2.13GHz),
16Gb ram , 2 Sun non-Raid HB
15 matches
Mail list logo
