Re: [zfs-discuss] send/recv, apparent data loss

2010-01-05 Thread Michael Herf
I didn't use -v, so I don't know. I just waited until the process exited, assuming it would succeed or fail. The sizes looked equivalent, so I went ahead with the "destroy, rename." For the jobs a couple weeks ago, I turned off the snapshot service. For this one, I probably left it on. Anything po

Re: [zfs-discuss] send/recv, apparent data loss

2010-01-05 Thread Ian Collins
Michael Herf wrote: I replayed a bunch of filesystems in order to get dedupe benefits. Only thing is a couple of them are rolled back to November or so (and I didn't notice before destroy'ing the old copy). I used something like: zfs snapshot pool/f...@dd zfs send -Rp pool/f...@dd | zfs recv -d

[zfs-discuss] send/recv, apparent data loss

2010-01-05 Thread Michael Herf
I replayed a bunch of filesystems in order to get dedupe benefits. Only thing is a couple of them are rolled back to November or so (and I didn't notice before destroy'ing the old copy). I used something like: zfs snapshot pool/f...@dd zfs send -Rp pool/f...@dd | zfs recv -d pool/fs2 (after done.