On May 2, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Jan Riechers wrote:
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Jan Riechers
> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> wrote:
> - "Jan Riechers" skrev:
> I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only using
> 40G s
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Jan Riechers wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> wrote:
>
>> - "Jan Riechers" skrev:
>>
>> I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only
>> using 40G since I thought I might use the rest for something el
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> - "Jan Riechers" skrev:
>
> I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only
> using 40G since I thought I might use the rest for something else. ZFS Time
> Slider was complaining the pool was filled for 90% a
- "Jan Riechers" skrev:
I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only using
40G since I thought I might use the rest for something else. ZFS Time Slider
was complaining the pool was filled for 90% and I decided to increase pool
size.
What I did was a zpool detac
I am using a mirrored system pool on 2 80G drives - however I was only using
40G since I thought I might use the rest for something else. ZFS Time Slider
was complaining the pool was filled for 90% and I decided to increase pool
size.
What I did was a zpool detach of one of the mirrored hdds and in
