Re: [zfs-discuss] renumbering and its potential side effects.

2007-03-01 Thread Eric Schrock
It should not matter if the controller numbers have changed. There are a few scenarios: 1. If the pool is active, and the underlying driver supports devids, then ZFS will still be able to open the correct devices. If the underlying driver doesn't support devids, or if the devids have al

Re: [zfs-discuss] renumbering and its potential side effects.

2007-03-01 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:05:44AM -0500, ozan s. yigit wrote: > i am forced to reinstall s10u3 on my x4500. SP 1.1.1. exported zpool, > and discovered during the reinstall that the controller numbers have > changed. what used to be c5t0d0 is now c6t0d0. it it happens the exported > zpool is using

Re: [zfs-discuss] renumbering and its potential side effects.

2007-03-01 Thread Wade . Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/01/2007 10:05:44 AM: > i am forced to reinstall s10u3 on my x4500. SP 1.1.1. exported zpool, > and discovered during the reinstall that the controller numbers have > changed. what used to be c5t0d0 is now c6t0d0. it it happens the exported > zpool is using only h

[zfs-discuss] renumbering and its potential side effects.

2007-03-01 Thread ozan s. yigit
i am forced to reinstall s10u3 on my x4500. SP 1.1.1. exported zpool, and discovered during the reinstall that the controller numbers have changed. what used to be c5t0d0 is now c6t0d0. it it happens the exported zpool is using only half the disks, and has no reference to a c6t0d0, but still a d