Brandon High wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Silly me. It is still Monday, and I am coffee challenged. RAIDoptimizer
>> is still an internal tool. However, for those who are interested in the
>> results
>> of a RAIDoptimizer run for 48 d
Yeah, I'm looking at using 10 disks or 16 disks (depending on which
chassis I get) - and I would like reasonable redundancy (not HA-crazy
redundancy where I can suffer tons of failures, I can power this down
and replace disks, it's a home server) and maximize the amount of
usable space.
Putting up
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Silly me. It is still Monday, and I am coffee challenged. RAIDoptimizer
> is still an internal tool. However, for those who are interested in the
> results
> of a RAIDoptimizer run for 48 disks, see:
> http://blogs.sun.c
Richard Elling wrote:
> Barton Fisk wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Forgive my ignorance of ZFS, but I have a customer that would like to set up
>> three 14+2 raidz2 groups on a new thor with 48 1TB drives (updated thumper)
>> so that 42TB for data could be achieved. What performance or other technical
>>
Barton Fisk wrote:
> Hi,
> Forgive my ignorance of ZFS, but I have a customer that would like to set up
> three 14+2 raidz2 groups on a new thor with 48 1TB drives (updated thumper)
> so that 42TB for data could be achieved. What performance or other technical
> issues with a stripe 14 disks wid
Barton Fisk wrote:
> Sorry I omitted that CF will be the boot device. Thanks again.
>
What are you using for redundancy of the boot device?
Ian
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
Sorry I omitted that CF will be the boot device. Thanks again.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 15:39, Barton Fisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Forgive my ignorance of ZFS, but I have a customer that would like to set up
> three 14+2 raidz2 groups on a new thor with 48 1TB drives (updated thumper)
> so that 42TB for data could be achieved. What performance or ot
Hi,
Forgive my ignorance of ZFS, but I have a customer that would like to set up
three 14+2 raidz2 groups on a new thor with 48 1TB drives (updated thumper) so
that 42TB for data could be achieved. What performance or other technical
issues with a stripe 14 disks wide would he likely see? He doe
