Re: [zfs-discuss] raid or mirror

2008-07-11 Thread Miles Nordin
> "jh" == Johan Hartzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jh> To be even MORE safe, you want the two disks to be on separate jh> controllers, so that you can survive a controller failure too. or a controller-driver-failure. At least on Linux, when a disk goes bad, Linux starts resettin

Re: [zfs-discuss] raid or mirror

2008-07-11 Thread Johan Hartzenberg
Hi Dick You want Mirroring. A Sun system with mirrored disks can be configured to not go down due to one disk failing. For this to be valid, you need to also make sure that the device used for SWAP is mirrored - you won't believe how many times I've seen this mistake being made. To be even MORE

[zfs-discuss] raid or mirror

2008-07-11 Thread dick hoogendijk
I'm still confused. What is a -SAFE- way with two drives if you prepare for hardware faulure? That is: one drive fails and the system does not go down because the other drive takes over. Do I need raid or mirror? -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D ++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxce snv9