Just checking, are you planning to have the receiving ZFS system read only?
I'm not sure how ZFS receive works on a system if changes have been made, but I
would expect they would be overwritten.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-dis
>It depends: if you like to be able to restore single files, zfs send/recv
would
>not be apropriate.
Why not?
With zfs you can easily view any file/dir from a snapshot (via the .zfs
dir). You can also copy that instance of the file into your running fs with
cp.
justin
smime.p7s
Description: S
eric kustarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Best Backup Script That Doesn't Do Backups, but I can't find it. In
> > essence, it just created a list of what changed since the last
> > backup and allowed you to use tar/cpio/cp - whatever to do the backup.
>
> I think zfs send/recv would be a gre
"Chris Cosby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If they are truly limited, something like an rsync or similar. There was a
> script being thrown around a while back that was touted as the Best Backup
> Script That Doesn't Do Backups, but I can't find it. In essence, it just
> created a list of what cha
Obviously, I should stop answering, as all I deal with and all that I will
deal with is GA Solaris. OpenSolaris might as well not exist as far as I'm
concerned. With that in mind, I'll just keep reading and appreciating all of
the good zfs info that comes along.
Peace out.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at
On Jul 29, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Chris Cosby wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Stefano Pini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> we are proposing a customer a couple of X4500 (24 Tb) used as NAS
> (i.e. NFS server).
> Both server will contain the same files and should be acces
Stefano Pini wrote:
> Hi guys,
> we are proposing a customer a couple of X4500 (24 Tb) used as NAS
> (i.e. NFS server).
> Both server will contain the same files and should be accessed by
> different clients at the same time (i.e. they should be both active)
What exactly are they trying to do
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Stefano Pini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> we are proposing a customer a couple of X4500 (24 Tb) used as NAS (i.e.
> NFS server).
> Both server will contain the same files and should be accessed by different
> clients at the same time (i.e. they should
Hi guys,
we are proposing a customer a couple of X4500 (24 Tb) used as NAS
(i.e. NFS server).
Both server will contain the same files and should be accessed by
different clients at the same time (i.e. they should be both active)
So we need to guarantee that both x4500 contain the same files:
Stefano Pini wrote:
> Hi guys,
> we are proposing a customer a couple of X4500 (24 Tb) used as NAS
> (i.e. NFS server).
> Both server will contain the same files and should be accessed by
> different clients at the same time (i.e. they should be both active)
> So we need to guarantee that both
Hi guys,
we are proposing a customer a couple of X4500 (24 Tb) used as NAS
(i.e. NFS server).
Both server will contain the same files and should be accessed by
different clients at the same time (i.e. they should be both active)
So we need to guarantee that both x4500 contain the same file
11 matches
Mail list logo
