On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> I know of customers who are using send|ssh|recv to replicate entire
> thumpers across the country, in production. I'm sure they'll speak up
> here if/when they find this thread...
Ah, that's who I'd like to hear from :)... Thanks for the secondhand
in
Hello Matthew,
Wednesday, October 17, 2007, 1:46:02 AM, you wrote:
MA> Richard Elling wrote:
>> Paul B. Henson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>>>
I've read a number of threads and blog posts discussing zfs send/receive
and its applicability is such an implementati
Richard Elling wrote:
> Paul B. Henson wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>>
>>> I've read a number of threads and blog posts discussing zfs send/receive
>>> and its applicability is such an implementation, but I'm curious if
>>> anyone has actually done something like that in pra
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>
>> I've read a number of threads and blog posts discussing zfs send/receive
>> and its applicability is such an implementation, but I'm curious if
>> anyone has actually done something like that in practice, and if so how
>> well
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I've read a number of threads and blog posts discussing zfs send/receive
> and its applicability is such an implementation, but I'm curious if
> anyone has actually done something like that in practice, and if so how
> well it worked.
So I didn't hear
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> You can use delegated administration ("zfs allow someone send pool/fs").
> This is in snv_69. RBAC is much more coarse-grained, but you could use
> it too.
Out of curiosity, what kind of things are going to be added via patches to
S10u4 vs things that
Hello Paul,
If you don't need a support then Sun Cluster 3.2 is free and it works
with ZFS.
What you could do is to setup 3-node cluster with 3 resource groups
each assigned with different primary node and failback set to true.
Of course in that config the storage requirements will be different.
Vincent Fox wrote:
> So the problem in the zfs send/receive thing, is what if your network
> glitches out during the transfers?
zfs doesn't know. It depends on how the pipe tolerates breakage.
> We have these once a day due to some as-yet-undiagnosed switch problem, a
> chop-out of 50 seconds
So the problem in the zfs send/receive thing, is what if your network glitches
out during the transfers?
We have these once a day due to some as-yet-undiagnosed switch problem, a
chop-out of 50 seconds or so which is enough to trip all our IPMP setups and
enough to abort SSH transfers in progre
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> Does zfs send/receive have to be done with root
> privileges, or can RBAC or some other mechanism be used so a lower
> privileged account could be used?
You can use delegated administration ("zfs allow someone send pool/fs").
This is in snv_69. RBAC is much more coarse-gr
We've been evaluating ZFS as a possible enterprise file system for our
campus. Initially, we were considering one large cluster, but it doesn't
look like that will scale to meet our needs. So, now we are thinking about
breaking our storage across multiple servers, probably three.
However, I don't
11 matches
Mail list logo
