Re: [zfs-discuss] poor zfs performance on my home server

2007-02-14 Thread Ian Collins
Sascha Brechenmacher wrote: > > Am 13.02.2007 um 22:46 schrieb Ian Collins: > >> Looks like poor hardware, how was the pool built? Did you give ZFS the >> entire drive? >> >> On my nForce4 Athlon64 box with two 250G SATA drives, >> >> zpool status tank >> pool: tank >> state: ONLINE >> scrub

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] poor zfs performance on my home server

2007-02-14 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Sascha, Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 6:45:30 AM, you wrote: SB> Am 13.02.2007 um 22:46 schrieb Ian Collins: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I switched my home server from Debian to Solaris. The main cause for >>> this step was stability and ZFS. >>> But now after the mig

Re: [zfs-discuss] poor zfs performance on my home server

2007-02-13 Thread Sascha Brechenmacher
Am 13.02.2007 um 22:46 schrieb Ian Collins: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I switched my home server from Debian to Solaris. The main cause for this step was stability and ZFS. But now after the migration (why isn't it possible to mount a linux fs on Solaris???) I make a few benchmarks and

Re: [zfs-discuss] poor zfs performance on my home server

2007-02-13 Thread Ian Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I switched my home server from Debian to Solaris. The main cause for > this step was stability and ZFS. > But now after the migration (why isn't it possible to mount a linux > fs on Solaris???) I make a few benchmarks > and now I thought about swtching back

[zfs-discuss] poor zfs performance on my home server

2007-02-13 Thread sb_mailings
Hello, I switched my home server from Debian to Solaris. The main cause for this step was stability and ZFS. But now after the migration (why isn't it possible to mount a linux fs on Solaris???) I make a few benchmarks and now I thought about swtching back to Debian. First of all the hardwa