>> >> > Our main storage is a HDS 9585V Thunder with vxfs and raid5 on 400 GB
>> >> > sata disk handled by the storage system. If I would migrate to zfs
>> >> > that would mean 390 jbod's.
>> >>
>> >> How so?
>>
>> CG> Do you mean whether the hds can be turned in to a (rather large) jbod
>> CG> st
Hello Claus,
Friday, February 16, 2007, 10:09:52 AM, you wrote:
>> >> > Our main storage is a HDS 9585V Thunder with vxfs and raid5 on 400 GB
>> >> > sata disk handled by the storage system. If I would migrate to zfs
>> >> > that would mean 390 jbod's.
>> >>
>> >> How so?
>>
>> CG> Do you mean wh
>> > Our main storage is a HDS 9585V Thunder with vxfs and raid5 on 400 GB
>> > sata disk handled by the storage system. If I would migrate to zfs
>> > that would mean 390 jbod's.
>>
>> How so?
CG> Do you mean whether the hds can be turned in to a (rather large) jbod
CG> storage system? I just fo
Hello Claus,
Friday, February 16, 2007, 9:18:26 AM, you wrote:
>> > Our main storage is a HDS 9585V Thunder with vxfs and raid5 on 400 GB
>> > sata disk handled by the storage system. If I would migrate to zfs
>> > that would mean 390 jbod's.
>>
>> How so?
CG> Do you mean whether the hds can be
> Our main storage is a HDS 9585V Thunder with vxfs and raid5 on 400 GB
> sata disk handled by the storage system. If I would migrate to zfs
> that would mean 390 jbod's.
How so?
Do you mean whether the hds can be turned in to a (rather large) jbod
storage system? I just found out yesterday tha
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Our main storage is a HDS 9585V Thunder with vxfs and raid5 on 400 GB
sata disk handled by the storage system. If I would migrate to zfs
that would mean 390 jbod's.
How so?
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.o
Hi.
I have tested zfs for a while and is very impressed with the ease one
can create filesystems (tanks). I'm about to try it out on a atabeast
with 42 ata 400 GB disks for internal use, mailny as a fileserver. If
this goes well (as I assume it will) I'll consider to desploy zfs on a
larger scale
