Eric Schrock wrote:
On 08/11/09 06:03, Darren J Moffat wrote:
I thought so too initially, then I changed my mind and I like it the
way it is. The reason being is that describing the intent allows
changing the implementation and keeping the meaning. It is the
intent that matters to the admi
On 08/11/09 06:03, Darren J Moffat wrote:
I thought so too initially, then I changed my mind and I like it the way
it is. The reason being is that describing the intent allows changing
the implementation and keeping the meaning. It is the intent that
matters to the administrator not the imp
przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:42:31AM -0700, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hi,
I like the new feature but I was thinking that maybe the keywords being used
should be different?
Currently it is:
# zfs set logbias=latency {dataset}
# zfs set logbias=throughput {dataset}
May
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:42:31AM -0700, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like the new feature but I was thinking that maybe the keywords being used
> should be different?
>
> Currently it is:
>
> # zfs set logbias=latency {dataset}
> # zfs set logbias=throughput {dataset}
>
> Maybe it wou
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hi,
I like the new feature but I was thinking that maybe the keywords being used
should be different?
Currently it is:
# zfs set logbias=latency {dataset}
# zfs set logbias=throughput {dataset}
Maybe it would be more clear this way:
# zfs set logdest=dedicated {datas
Hi,
I like the new feature but I was thinking that maybe the keywords being used
should be different?
Currently it is:
# zfs set logbias=latency {dataset}
# zfs set logbias=throughput {dataset}
Maybe it would be more clear this way:
# zfs set logdest=dedicated {dataset}
# zfs set logdest=pool
