Re: [zfs-discuss] new labelfix needed

2010-09-02 Thread Benjamin Brumaire
my company changed our SAN and I migrated our zpool to the new luns with attach/detach while the zpool stayed online. Once finished we had a cluster crash and the zpool (on new luns) get corrupted. No way to import it, zpool import -fFX failed. The old luns are detached and probably sane from

Re: [zfs-discuss] new labelfix needed

2010-09-02 Thread Mark J Musante
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Benjamin Brumaire wrote: your point have only a rethoric meaning. I'm not sure what you mean by that. I was asking specifically about your situation. You want to run labelfix on /dev/rdsk/c0d1s4 - what happened to that slice that requires a labelfix? Is there something

Re: [zfs-discuss] new labelfix needed

2010-09-01 Thread Benjamin Brumaire
your point have only a rethoric meaning. System breaks regardless the ressource you put to build it. Bad hardware, typo, human mistakes, bugs, This mailing-list is full of examples. Having some tools like zdb, mdb, zfs import -fFX and labelfix for analyzis and repair is always a good thing.

Re: [zfs-discuss] new labelfix needed

2010-08-31 Thread Mark J Musante
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Benjamin Brumaire wrote: As this feature didn't make it into zfs it would be nice to have it again. Better to spend time fixing the problem that requires a 'labelfix' as a workaround, surely. What's causing the need to fix vdev labels? __

[zfs-discuss] new labelfix needed

2010-08-30 Thread Benjamin Brumaire
Hi, labelfix http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=229969 saved already a lot of data as it makes dettached devices "importable". A quick test today shows labelfix won't work anymore: #uname -a SunOs bigmama 5.11 snv_127 i86pc 386 i86pc Solaris #./labelfix /dev/rdsk/c0d1s4 ld.so