bene...@yahoo.com said:
> Marion - Do you happen to know which SAS hba it applys to?
Here's the article:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-248487-1
The title is "Write-Caching on JBOD SATA Drive is Erroneously Enabled
by Default When Connected to Non-RAID SAS HBAs".
By
Marion - Do you happen to know which SAS hba it applys to?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
erik.trim...@sun.com said:
> All J4xxx systems are really nothing more than huge SAS expanders hooked to
> a bunch of disks, so cache flush requests will either come from ZFS or any
> attached controller. Note that I /think/ most non-RAID controllers don't
> initiate their own cache flush reque
Brad wrote:
Since the j4500 doesn't have a internal SAS controller, would it be safe to say
that ZFS cache flushes would be handled by the host's SAS hba?
Well. It depends on what you mean as "cache flush". Cache flushes
happen at a couple of points:
(1) ZFS decides it's time to wri
Since the j4500 doesn't have a internal SAS controller, would it be safe to say
that ZFS cache flushes would be handled by the host's SAS hba?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://ma
