Frank Middleton wrote:
On 10/13/09 18:35, Albert Chin wrote:
Maybe this will help:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/storage-discuss/2009-September/007118.html
Well, it does seem to explain the scrub problem. I think it might
also explain the slow boot and startup problem - the VM only
On 10/13/09 18:35, Albert Chin wrote:
Maybe this will help:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/storage-discuss/2009-September/007118.html
Well, it does seem to explain the scrub problem. I think it might
also explain the slow boot and startup problem - the VM only has
564M available, an
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:00:35PM -0400, Frank Middleton wrote:
> After a recent upgrade to b124, decided to switch to COMSTAR for iscsi
> targets for VirtualBox hosted on AMD64 Fedora C10. Both target and
> initiator are running zfs under b124. This combination seems
> unbelievably slow compared
After a recent upgrade to b124, decided to switch to COMSTAR
for iscsi targets for VirtualBox hosted on AMD64 Fedora C10. Both
target and initiator are running zfs under b124. This combination
seems unbelievably slow compared to the old iscsi subsystem.
A scrub of a local 20GB disk on the target
