Ethan Erchinger wrote:
> Here is a sample set of messages at that time. It looks like timeouts
> on the SSD for various requested blocks. Maybe I need to talk with
> Intel about this issue.
>
Keeping everyone up-to-date, for those who care, I've RMAd the Intel
drive, and will retest when
Richard Elling wrote:
> The answer may lie in the /var/adm/messages file which should report
> if a reset was received or sent.
Here is a sample set of messages at that time. It looks like timeouts
on the SSD for various requested blocks. Maybe I need to talk with
Intel about this issue.
Ethan
Ethan Erchinger wrote:
>
> Richard Elling wrote:
>>>
>>>asc = 0x29
>>>ascq = 0x0
>>
>> ASC/ASCQ 29/00 is POWER ON, RESET, OR BUS DEVICE RESET OCCURRED
>> http://www.t10.org/lists/asc-num.htm#ASC_29
>>
>> [this should be more descriptive as the codes are, more-or-less,
>> standardiz
Richard Elling wrote:
>>
>>asc = 0x29
>>ascq = 0x0
>
> ASC/ASCQ 29/00 is POWER ON, RESET, OR BUS DEVICE RESET OCCURRED
> http://www.t10.org/lists/asc-num.htm#ASC_29
>
> [this should be more descriptive as the codes are, more-or-less,
> standardized, I'll try to file an RFE, unless
Ethan Erchinger wrote:
>
>
> Richard Elling wrote:
>>
>> I've seen these symptoms when a large number of errors were reported
>> in a short period of time and memory was low. What does "fmdump -eV"
>> show?
>>
> fmdump -eV shows lots of messages like this, and yea, I believe that
> to be sd16 whi
Tim wrote:
>
>
> Are you leaving ANY ram for zfs to do it's thing? If you're consuming
> ALL system memory for just this file/application, I would expect the
> system to fall over and die.
>
Hmm. I believe that the kernel should manage that relationship for me.
If the system cannot manage swa
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Ethan Erchinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ross wrote:
> > I'm no expert, but the first thing I'd ask is whether you could repeat
> that test without using compression? I'd be quite worried about how a
> system is going to perform when it's basically running
Ross wrote:
> I'm no expert, but the first thing I'd ask is whether you could repeat that
> test without using compression? I'd be quite worried about how a system is
> going to perform when it's basically running off a 50GB compressed file.
>
>
Yes this does occur with compression off, but
Richard Elling wrote:
>
> I've seen these symptoms when a large number of errors were reported
> in a short period of time and memory was low. What does "fmdump -eV"
> show?
>
fmdump -eV shows lots of messages like this, and yea, I believe that to
be sd16 which is the SSD:
Dec 03 2008 08:31:11
Ethan Erchinger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First, I'll say my intent is not to spam a bunch of lists, but after
> posting to opensolaris-discuss I had someone communicate with me offline
> that these lists would possibly be a better place to start. So here we
> are. For those on all three lists, sorr
I'm no expert, but the first thing I'd ask is whether you could repeat that
test without using compression? I'd be quite worried about how a system is
going to perform when it's basically running off a 50GB compressed file.
There seem to be a lot of variables here, on quite a few new systems, a
Hi all,
First, I'll say my intent is not to spam a bunch of lists, but after
posting to opensolaris-discuss I had someone communicate with me offline
that these lists would possibly be a better place to start. So here we
are. For those on all three lists, sorry for the repetition.
Second, thi
12 matches
Mail list logo