On 25 Feb 2010, at 14:28, Sean Sprague wrote:
> Bob,
>
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>>
>>> and what uname -s reports.
>>
>> It will surely report "OrkOS".
>
> For OpenSolaris, "OracOS" - surely there must be Blakes 7 fans in Oracle
> Corp.?
You can see all the working bit
Bob,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Joerg Schilling wrote:
and what uname -s reports.
It will surely report "OrkOS".
For OpenSolaris, "OracOS" - surely there must be Blakes 7 fans in Oracle
Corp.?
I am glad to be able to contribute positively and constructively to
this discussion.
Metoo ;-) ..
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Joerg Schilling wrote:
and what uname -s reports.
It will surely report "OrkOS".
Ork:
2. (Mythology) A mythical monster of varying descriptions; an
ogre.
[PJC]
Goblins, hobgoblins, and orcs of the worst
description.
Erik Trimble wrote:
> But, yes, the proper way to talk all about this now is to say "Oracle"
> when you mean the company, and "Sun" when you are talking about specific
> brand-name products. The latter will almost certainly be restricted to
> hardware - all software that I know of is having a
Hi,
> Without saying anything negative about Nexenta I would strongly recommend
> you go try to send a single patch to their equivalent of onnv-gate before
> recommending it as any sort of replacement for OpenSolaris.
Not sure what the above is intended to mean.
To clear things, Nexenta project
http://www.oracle.com/features/suncustomers.html
link to "Oracle Plans" statement
Personally I am not "freaking" I think the product is too good for
Oracle to Flush the technology, who knows what the future holds. I do
have the wait and see approach but until I see some drastic departure
f
James C. McPherson wrote:
On 22/02/10 09:40 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into w
Oracle is reviewing the Sun product roadmap and will provide guidance to
customers in accordance with Oracle's standard product communication
policies. Any resulting features and timing of release of such features
as determined by Oracle's review of roadmaps, are at the sole discretion
of Oracle
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Henrik Johansen wrote:
> On 02/22/10 03:35 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
>>
>> On 02/22/10 09:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/22/10 02:33 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 06:12, Henrik Johansen wrote:
>
> Well - once thing that makes me f
On 02/22/10 03:35 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 09:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On 02/22/10 02:33 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 06:12, Henrik Johansen wrote:
Well - once thing that makes me feel a bit uncomfortable is the fact
that you no longer can buy OpenSolaris Support subscrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/02/2010 14:35, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
> On 02/22/10 09:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
>> On 02/22/10 02:33 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
>>> On 02/22/10 06:12, Henrik Johansen wrote:
Well - once thing that makes me feel a bit uncomfortable is the fact
On 02/22/10 09:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On 02/22/10 02:33 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
On 02/22/10 06:12, Henrik Johansen wrote:
Well - once thing that makes me feel a bit uncomfortable is the fact
that you no longer can buy OpenSolaris Support subscriptions.
Almost every trace of it has vanishe
n.com
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter Tribble
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 1:40 PM
To: Eugen Leitl
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] future of OpenSolaris
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:
On 22/02/10 09:40 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into who core
zfs developers are
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
> the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
> in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into who core
> zfs developers are (have any been fired by Sun even prio
On 02/22/10 12:00 PM, Michael Ramchand wrote:
I think Oracle have been quite clear about their plans for OpenSolaris.
They have publicly said they plan to continue to support it and the
community.
They're just a little distracted right now because they are in the
process of on-boarding many thou
I think Oracle have been quite clear about their plans for OpenSolaris.
They have publicly said they plan to continue to support it and the
community.
They're just a little distracted right now because they are in the
process of on-boarding many thousand Sun employees, and trying to get
them
Eugen Leitl wrote:
Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into who core
zfs developers are (have any been fired by Sun even prior to
the merger?), and who's paying them.
Oracle's silence is starting to become a bit ominous. What are
the future options for zfs, should OpenSolaris be left dead
in the water by Suracle? I have no insight into who core
zfs developers are (have any been fired by Sun even prior to
the merger?), and who's paying them. Assuming a worst cas
19 matches
Mail list logo
