Joerg Moellenkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in a different benchmark run on the same system, the gfind took 15
> minutes whereas the standarf find took 18 minutes. With find and
> noatime=off the benchmark took 14 minutes. But even this is slow
> compared to 2-3 minutes of the xfs
Joerg Moellenkamp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in a different benchmark run on the same system, the gfind took 15
> minutes whereas the standarf find took 18 minutes. With find and
> noatime=off the benchmark took 14 minutes. But even this is slow
> compared to 2-3 minutes of the xfs system.
just askin
Hello,
in a different benchmark run on the same system, the gfind took 15
minutes whereas the standarf find took 18 minutes. With find and
noatime=off the benchmark took 14 minutes. But even this is slow
compared to 2-3 minutes of the xfs system.
Regards
Joerg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>Hello,
>
>in a benchmark a find to a filename (find -name foobar ) , ZFS is approx
>7 times slower than an XFS filesystem (14 minutes ZFS,2 Minutes XFS).
>The filesystem consists out of a huge amount of files.
>
>I assume, that ZFS has no comparable function to the directory indexes
>like XFS
Hello,
in a benchmark a find to a filename (find -name foobar ) , ZFS is approx
7 times slower than an XFS filesystem (14 minutes ZFS,2 Minutes XFS).
The filesystem consists out of a huge amount of files.
I assume, that ZFS has no comparable function to the directory indexes
like XFS or the di
