> >Quoth Darren Dunham on Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:50:33PM -0700:
> >> But a traditional filesystem isn't going to write anything without a
> >> request. ZFS is constantly updating the pool/uberblock status the way
> >> things currently work. So even if you choose to defer the atime update
> >> un
>Quoth Darren Dunham on Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:50:33PM -0700:
>> But a traditional filesystem isn't going to write anything without a
>> request. ZFS is constantly updating the pool/uberblock status the way
>> things currently work. So even if you choose to defer the atime update
>> until much
Quoth Darren Dunham on Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:50:33PM -0700:
> But a traditional filesystem isn't going to write anything without a
> request. ZFS is constantly updating the pool/uberblock status the way
> things currently work. So even if you choose to defer the atime update
> until much longer
> > Prompted by a recent /. article on atime vs realtime ranting by some
> > Linux kernel hackers (Linus included) I went back and looked at the
> > mount_ufs(1M) man page because I was sure that OpenSolaris had more than
> > just atime,noatime. Yep sure enough UFS has dfratime.
> >
> > So tha
Quoth Darren J Moffat on Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:32:02AM +0100:
> Prompted by a recent /. article on atime vs realtime ranting by some
> Linux kernel hackers (Linus included) I went back and looked at the
> mount_ufs(1M) man page because I was sure that OpenSolaris had more than
> just atime,noa
