Hello Bob,
Sunday, July 20, 2008, 5:08:23 PM, you wrote:
BF> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Mattias Pantzare wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a ZFS-specific method for doing that beats the heck of out tar,
>>> etc?
>>> (RTFM indicates there is not; I R'd the FM :^).
>>
>> Use zfs send | zfs receive if you wish to
Jim Mauro wrote:
> So I'm really exposing my ignorance here, but...
>
> You wrote "/... if you wish to keep your snapshots.../"...
> I never mentioned snapshots, thus you
> introduced the use of a ZFS snapshot as a method of doing what
> I wish to do. And yes, snapshots and send are in the manual,
So I'm really exposing my ignorance here, but...
You wrote "/... if you wish to keep your snapshots.../"...
I never mentioned snapshots, thus you
introduced the use of a ZFS snapshot as a method of doing what
I wish to do. And yes, snapshots and send are in the manual, and
I read about them.
I in
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Mattias Pantzare wrote:
>>
>> Is there a ZFS-specific method for doing that beats the heck of out tar, etc?
>> (RTFM indicates there is not; I R'd the FM :^).
>
> Use zfs send | zfs receive if you wish to keep your snapshots or if
> you will be doing the copy several times. You
2008/7/20 James Mauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there an optimal method of making a complete copy of a ZFS, aside from the
> conventional methods (tar, cpio)?
>
> We have an existing ZFS that was not created with the optimal recordsize.
> We wish to create a new ZFS with the optimal recordsize (8k
Is there an optimal method of making a complete copy of a ZFS, aside from the
conventional methods (tar, cpio)?
We have an existing ZFS that was not created with the optimal recordsize.
We wish to create a new ZFS with the optimal recordsize (8k), and copy
all the data from the existing ZFS to th
