Re: [zfs-discuss] checking/fixing busy locks for zfs send/receive

2012-03-16 Thread Philip Brown
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Brandon High wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >> if there isnt a process visible doing this via ps, I'm wondering how >> one might check if a zfs filesystem or snapshot is rendered "busy" in >> this way, interfering with an unmount or

Re: [zfs-discuss] checking/fixing busy locks for zfs send/receive

2012-03-16 Thread Richard Elling
On Mar 16, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Brandon High wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Philip Brown wrote: >> if there isnt a process visible doing this via ps, I'm wondering how >> one might check if a zfs filesystem or snapshot is rendered "busy" in >> this way, interfering with an unmount or dest

Re: [zfs-discuss] checking/fixing busy locks for zfs send/receive

2012-03-16 Thread Brandon High
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Philip Brown wrote: > if there isnt a process visible doing this via ps, I'm wondering how > one might check if a zfs filesystem or snapshot is rendered "busy" in > this way, interfering with an unmount or destroy? > > I'm also wondering if this sort of thing can m

[zfs-discuss] checking/fixing busy locks for zfs send/receive

2012-03-16 Thread Philip Brown
It was suggested to me by Ian Collins, that doing zfs sends and receives, can render a filesystem "busy". if there isnt a process visible doing this via ps, I'm wondering how one might check if a zfs filesystem or snapshot is rendered "busy" in this way, interfering with an unmount or destroy? I'