FYI, we are literally just days from having this fixed.
Matt: after putback you really should blog about this one --
both to let people know that this long-standing bug has been
fixed, and to describe your approach to it.
It's a surprisingly tricky and interesting problem.
Jeff
On Sat, Jul 05,
If it ever does get released I'd love to hear about it. That bug, and the fact
it appears to have been outstanding for three years, was one of the major
reasons behind us not purchasing a bunch of x4500's.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Robert Lawhead <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About a month ago (Jun 2008), I received information indicating that a
> putback fixing this problem was in the works and might appear as soon as
> b92. Apparently this estimate was overly optimistic; Does anyone know
>
About a month ago (Jun 2008), I received information indicating that a putback
fixing this problem was in the works and might appear as soon as b92.
Apparently this estimate was overly optimistic; Does anyone know anything about
progress on this issue or have a revised estimate for the putback?
On Jan 26, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
Is anyone working on that bug? Any progress?
For bug:
6343667 scrub/resilver has to start over when a snapshot is taken
I believe that is on Matt and Mark's radar, and they have made some
progress.
eric
_
Hello zfs-discuss,
Is anyone working on that bug? Any progress?
It's really PITA on x4500 when one wants/needs snapshots regularry
and resilvering of bad disks can take many days...
--
Best regards,
Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
