Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-29 Thread Richard Jahnel
Exactly where in the menu.lst would I put the -r ? Thanks in advance. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-28 Thread Russ Price
> This problem is known an fixed in later builds: > > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6923585 > > AFAIK it is going to be included into b134a as well OK, I just did some checking, and my rpool was already set up with autoreplace=off. It's necessary to use the -r bo

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-28 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On 28-3-2010 7:35, Victor Latushkin wrote: This problem is known an fixed in later builds: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6923585 AFAIK it is going to be included into b134a as well It's now March 28. For OpenSolaris 2010.03 that means only a few days remaining...

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread Victor Latushkin
This problem is known an fixed in later builds: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6923585 AFAIK it is going to be included into b134a as well Sent from my iPhone On Mar 27, 2010, at 22:26, Russ Price wrote: I have two 500 GB drives on my system that are attached to

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread William Bauer
What I don't understand then is why can I do this with some frequency without any delays on my 2009.06 and S10 systems? I have a three disk mirror at home, one disk in an esata dock. Sometimes I don't turn on the dock, and the system boots just as quickly. Likewise, I've done this with two-di

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread Ian Collins
On 03/28/10 04:18 PM, Tim Cook wrote: Sounds exactly like the behavior people have had previously while a system is trying to recover a pool with a faulted drive. I'll have to check and see if I can dig up one of those old threads. I vaguely recall someone here had a single drive fail on a

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:03 PM, William Bauer wrote: > Depends on a lot of things. I'd let it sit for at least half an hour to > see if you get any messages. 30 seconds, if it's waiting for the driver > stack timeouts, is way too short. > - > > I'm not the OP, but

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread William Bauer
Depends on a lot of things.  I'd let it sit for at least half an hour to see if you get any messages.  30 seconds, if it's waiting for the driver stack timeouts, is way too short. - I'm not the OP, but I let my VB guest sit for an hour now, and nothing new has happen

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread William Bauer
Good idea (importing from a LiveCD). I just did this, and it imported without any unusual complaint, except for the usual "DEGRADED" state because a member is missing. Also, for whatever this is worth, I noticed that v134 now shows the mirror (or the first mirror) as "mirror-0" instead of just

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:57 PM, William Bauer wrote: > Posted this reply in the help forum, copying it here: > > I frequently use mirrors to replace disks, or even as a backup with an > esata dock. So I set up v134 with a mirror in VB, ran installgrub, then > detached each drive in turn. I compl

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread William Bauer
Posted this reply in the help forum, copying it here: I frequently use mirrors to replace disks, or even as a backup with an esata dock. So I set up v134 with a mirror in VB, ran installgrub, then detached each drive in turn. I completely duplicated and can confirm your problem, and since I'm q

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Russ Price wrote: > > What build? How long have you waited for the boot? It > > almost sounds to me like it's waiting for the > > drive and hasn't timed out before you give up and > > power it off. > > I waited about three minutes. This is a b134 installation. >

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread Russ Price
> What build?  How long have you waited for the boot?  It > almost sounds to me like it's waiting for the > drive and hasn't timed out before you give up and > power it off. I waited about three minutes. This is a b134 installation. One one of my tests, I tried shoving the removed mirror into the

Re: [zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread Tim Cook
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Russ Price wrote: > I have two 500 GB drives on my system that are attached to built-in SATA > ports on my Asus M4A785-M motherboard, running in AHCI mode. If I shut down > the system, remove either drive, and then try to boot the system, it will > fail to boot. I

[zfs-discuss] b134 - Mirrored rpool won't boot unless both mirrors are present

2010-03-27 Thread Russ Price
I have two 500 GB drives on my system that are attached to built-in SATA ports on my Asus M4A785-M motherboard, running in AHCI mode. If I shut down the system, remove either drive, and then try to boot the system, it will fail to boot. If I disable the splash screen, I find that it will display