Re: [zfs-discuss] about write balancing

2011-07-01 Thread Tuomas Leikola
Sorry everyone, this one was indeed a case of root stupidity. I had forgotten to upgrade to OI 148, which apparently fixed the write balancer. Duh. (didn't find full changelog from google tho.) On Jun 30, 2011 3:12 PM, "Tuomas Leikola" wrote: > Thanks for the input. This was not a case of degraded

Re: [zfs-discuss] about write balancing

2011-06-30 Thread Tuomas Leikola
Thanks for the input. This was not a case of degraded vdev, but only a missing log device (which i cannot get rid of..). I'll try offlining some vdevs and see what happens - altough this should be automatic atf all times IMO. On Jun 30, 2011 1:25 PM, "Markus Kovero" wrote: > > >> To me it seems th

Re: [zfs-discuss] about write balancing

2011-06-30 Thread Markus Kovero
> To me it seems that writes are not directed properly to the devices that have > most free space - almost exactly the opposite. The writes seem to go to the > devices that have _least_ free space, instead of the devices that have most > free space. The same effect that can be seen in these 6

[zfs-discuss] about write balancing

2011-06-29 Thread Tuomas Leikola
Hi! I've been monitoring my arrays lately, and to me it seems like the zfs allocator might be misfiring a bit. This is all on OI 147 and if there is a problem and a fix, i'd like to see it in the next image-update =D Here's some 60s iostat cleaned up a bit: tank3.76T 742G