Matt Ingenthron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not an expert (nor am I offering legal advice), but my understanding
> of GPLv2 is the copyright holder can explicitly state exceptions on
> linking, so they could allow linking with ZFS even though it's under the
> CDDL. Linux, when run on say
Erik Trimble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There have been extensive discussions on loadable modules and licensing
> w/r/t the GPLv2 in the linux kernel. nVidia, amongst others, pushed hard
> to allow for non-GPL-compatible licensed code to be allowed as a Linux
> kernel module. However, the ke
There have been extensive discussions on loadable modules and licensing
w/r/t the GPLv2 in the linux kernel. nVidia, amongst others, pushed hard
to allow for non-GPL-compatible licensed code to be allowed as a Linux
kernel module. However, the kernel developers' consensus seems to have
come do
James Dickens wrote:
On 11/6/06, Yuen L. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm
curious whether there is a version of Linux 2.6 ZFS available?
Many thanks.
sorry there is no ZFS in Linux, and given current stands of Linus
Torvalds and the current Kernel team there never will be, because
On 11/6/06, Yuen L. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm curious whether there is a version of Linux 2.6 ZFS available?Many thanks.sorry there is no ZFS in Linux, and given current stands of Linus Torvalds and the current Kernel team there never will be, because Linux is GPLv2 and it is incompatible
Hi Yuen,
Not to my knowledge. I believe this project is working on it though:
http://zfs-on-fuse.blogspot.com/
Best Regards,
Jason
On 11/6/06, Yuen L. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm curious whether there is a version of Linux 2.6 ZFS available?
Many thanks.
This message posted from opens
I'm curious whether there is a version of Linux 2.6 ZFS available?
Many thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
