At the time we had it setup as 3 x 5 disk raidz, plus a hot spare. These 16
disks were in a SAS cabinet, and the the slog was on the server itself. We are
now running 2 x 7 raidz2 plus a hot spare and slog, all inside the cabinet.
Since the disks are 1.5T, I was concerned about resliver times fo
group.
---
Karl Katzke
Systems Analyst II
TAMU DRGS
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of JOrdan
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 2:42 PM
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS for
Thanks Scott. I really appreciate your feedback. I'm curious about the number
of disks, raidz/2 setup information?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/l
I have used build 124 in this capacity, although I did zero tuning. I had about
4T of data on a single 5T iSCSI volume over gigabit. The windows server was a
VM, and the opensolaris box is on a Dell 2950, 16G of RAM, x25e for the zil, no
l2arc cache device. I used comstar.
It was being used as
For ease of administration with everyone in the department i'd prefer to keep
everything consistent in the windows world.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/ma
hello
do you want to use it as a file smb-fileserver or do you want to have other
windows services? if you want to use it as a file server only, i would suggest
to use build in cifs server.
iscsi will be always slower than native cifs server and you have snapshots via
windows property previo
I'm looking to move our file storage from Windows to Opensolaris/zfs. The
windows box will be connected through 10g for iscsi to the storage. The windows
box will continue to serve the windows clients and will be hosting
approximately 4TB of data.
The physical box is a sunfire x4240, single AMD
