>For example, ls recently got -% option. This seems to work for
>/usr/bin/ls, /usr/xpg4/bin/ls, and /usr/xpg6/bin/ls. so, that's good!
>albeit a little surprising.
There's only one source file. So if you add an option you'll add it to
all of them.
>But if /usr/xpg6/bin/ls came first in PATH
> "fm" == Fredrich Maney writes:
fm> Oddly enough, that seems to be the path was taken by
fm> Sun quite some time ago with /usr/bin. Those tools are the
fm> standard, default tools on Sun systems for a reason: they are
fm> the ones that are maintained and updated with new feat
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Miles Nordin wrote:
>> "fm" == Fredrich Maney writes:
>
>fm> changing the default toolset (without notification)
>
> I wouldn't wish for notification all the time and tell people they
> cannot move unless they notify everyone, or you will get a bunch of
>
> "fm" == Fredrich Maney writes:
fm> changing the default toolset (without notification)
I wouldn't wish for notification all the time and tell people they
cannot move unless they notify everyone, or you will get a bunch of
CYA disclaimers and still have no input. And if you won't take
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
[...]
>> > 3)The educated/smart Linux users. They know about the differences
>> > and they are able to decide whether they like to use the Solaris
>> > tools with full Solaris
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
>
>
> Hmmm... I don't think a Linux user can be "really dumb". He/she would
> not run Linux, but a certain other system. :-)
My mother just ordered a netbook that came with ubuntu. She can barely
handle turning a system on. So there mo
> > Ouch! Neither OSX nor *BSD are GNU-based. They do ship with
> > GNU-related things but that's been a long and hard battle.
>
> While you are true, this isn't going to help on.
I agree.
> I see three possible types of Linux users that should be discussed.
>
> 1)The really dumb Linux user
"Volker A. Brandt" wrote:
> > Given the massive success of GNU based systems (Linux, OS X, *BSD)
>
> Ouch! Neither OSX nor *BSD are GNU-based. They do ship with
> GNU-related things but that's been a long and hard battle.
While you are true, this isn't going to help on.
Let me try to give som
On 29-Jan-09, at 4:53 PM, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
>> Given the massive success of GNU based systems (Linux, OS X, *BSD)
>
> Ouch! Neither OSX nor *BSD are GNU-based.
I meant, extensive GNU userland (in OS X's case).
(sorry Ian)
--Toby
> They do ship with
> GNU-related things but that's been
> "fm" == Fredrich Maney writes:
fm> put the GNU utilities in default system wide path before the
fm> native Sun utilities in order to make it easier to attract
fm> Linux users
It's a quick thing to make it feel like you're ``doing something about
the problem'' but the idea of di
Volker A. Brandt wrote:
>> Given the massive success of GNU based systems (Linux, OS X, *BSD)
>>
>
> Ouch! Neither OSX nor *BSD are GNU-based.
Not here, please. This topic has been beaten to death on the discuss
list, where it's topical.
--
Ian.
_
> Given the massive success of GNU based systems (Linux, OS X, *BSD)
Ouch! Neither OSX nor *BSD are GNU-based. They do ship with
GNU-related things but that's been a long and hard battle.
And the massive success has really only been Linux due to brilliant
PR (and FUD about *BSD) and OS X due to
On 29-Jan-09, at 2:17 PM, Ross wrote:
> Yeah, breaking functionality in one of the main reasons people are
> going to be trying OpenSolaris is just dumb... really, really dumb.
>
> One thing Linux, Windows, OS/X, etc all get right is that they're
> pretty easy to use right out of the box. Th
Yeah, breaking functionality in one of the main reasons people are going to be
trying OpenSolaris is just dumb... really, really dumb.
One thing Linux, Windows, OS/X, etc all get right is that they're pretty easy
to use right out of the box. They're all different, but they all do their own
job
Christine Tran wrote:
>> There was a very long discussion about this a couple of weeks ago on
>> one of the lists. Apparently the decision was made to put the GNU
>> utilities in default system wide path before the native Sun utilities
>> in order to make it easier to attract Linux users by making
> There was a very long discussion about this a couple of weeks ago on
> one of the lists. Apparently the decision was made to put the GNU
> utilities in default system wide path before the native Sun utilities
> in order to make it easier to attract Linux users by making the
> environment more fam
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Christine Tran
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Christine Tran
> wrote:
>> What is wrong with this?
>>
>> # chmod -R A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow /var/apache
>> chmod: invalid mode: `A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow
Hit this myself. I could be wrong, but from memory I think the paths are ok if
you're a normal user, it's just root that's messed up.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opens
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Christine Tran
wrote:
> What is wrong with this?
>
> # chmod -R A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow /var/apache
> chmod: invalid mode: `A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow'
> Try `chmod --help' for more information.
>
Never mind. /usr/
What is wrong with this?
# chmod -R A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow /var/apache
chmod: invalid mode: `A+user:webservd:add_file/write_data/execute:allow'
Try `chmod --help' for more information.
This works in a zone, works on S10u5, does not work on OpenSolaris2008.11.
CT
__
20 matches
Mail list logo
