Two caveats inline …
On 1 Feb 2011, at 01:05, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> On 01/31/11 04:48 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>>> As I've said here on the list a few times earlier, the last on the
>>> thread 'ZFS not usable (was ZFS Dedup question)', I've been doing some
>>> rather thorough testing on
On 01/31/11 04:48 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
As I've said here on the list a few times earlier, the last on the
thread 'ZFS not usable (was ZFS Dedup question)', I've been doing some
rather thorough testing on zfs dedup, and as you can see from the
posts, it wasn't very satisfactory. The doc
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
>
> Sorry about the initial post - it was wrong. The hardware configuration was
> right, but for initial tests, I use NFS, meaning sync writes. This obviously
> stresses th
> As I've said here on the list a few times earlier, the last on the
> thread 'ZFS not usable (was ZFS Dedup question)', I've been doing some
> rather thorough testing on zfs dedup, and as you can see from the
> posts, it wasn't very satisfactory. The docs claim 1-2GB memory usage
> per terabyte st
