antst writes:
> I'm more than happy by the fact that data consumes even less physical
> space on storage. But I want to understand why and how. And want to
> know to what numbers I can trust.
my guess is sparse files.
BTW, I think you should compare the size returned from "du -bx" with
"refer"
I'm more than happy by the fact that data consumes even less physical space on
storage.
But I want to understand why and how. And want to know to what numbers I can
trust.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-dis
I would expect to see uncompressed size by "--apparent-size".
And what I see much above uncompressed size obtained by multiplication of
compressed size and ratio.
In fact, apparent size is consistent with amount used by same set of files on
linux system. (I'm moving my home directories from linux
On 01 February, 2010 - antst sent me these 0,6K bytes:
> Probably I'm missing something here, but what I see on my system
>
> zfs list -o used,ratio,compression,name export/home/user
> 89.6G 2.86xgzip-4 export/home/user
>
> cmsmaster ~ # du -hs /export/home/user/
> 90G /export/home/use
Probably I'm missing something here, but what I see on my system
zfs list -o used,ratio,compression,name export/home/user
89.6G 2.86xgzip-4 export/home/user
cmsmaster ~ # du -hs /export/home/user/
90G /export/home/user/
du -hsb /export/home/user/
380781942931/export/home/user/
89.
