Victor Latushkin wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
Neil Perrin wrote:
ZFS checksums are at the block level.
This has been causing some confusion lately, so perhaps we could say:
ZFS checksums are at the file system block level, not to be confused with
the disk block level or transport block level
Richard Elling wrote:
Neil Perrin wrote:
ZFS checksums are at the block level.
This has been causing some confusion lately, so perhaps we could say:
ZFS checksums are at the file system block level, not to be confused with
the disk block level or transport block level.
Saying that ZFS check
Neil Perrin wrote:
ZFS checksums are at the block level.
This has been causing some confusion lately, so perhaps we could say:
ZFS checksums are at the file system block level, not to be confused with
the disk block level or transport block level.
-- richard
___
ZFS checksums are at the block level.
Nathan Essex wrote On 02/01/07 08:27,:
I am trying to understand if zfs checksums apply at a file or a block level.
We know that zfs provides end to end checksum integrity, and I assumed that
when I write a file to a zfs filesystem, the checksum was calcu
On 2/1/07, Nathan Essex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to understand if zfs checksums apply at a file or a block level.
We know that zfs provides end to end checksum integrity, and I assumed that
when I write a file to a zfs filesystem, the checksum was calculated at a file
level, as
I am trying to understand if zfs checksums apply at a file or a block level.
We know that zfs provides end to end checksum integrity, and I assumed that
when I write a file to a zfs filesystem, the checksum was calculated at a file
level, as opposed to say, a block level. However, I have notic
