On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> If you have a Sun support contract, open a support call and ask to be added
> to SR #72456444, which is the case I have open to try and get a better
> solution to chmod/ACL interaction.
CR#6933018 has been created for this issue; for any interested part
Paul B. Henson schrieb:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Ralf Utermann wrote:
>
>> we recently started to look at a ZFS based solution as a possible
>> replacement for our DCE/DFS based campus filesystem (yes, this is still
>> in production here).
>
> Hey, a fellow DFS shop :)... We finally migrated the las
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Ralf Utermann wrote:
> we recently started to look at a ZFS based solution as a possible
> replacement for our DCE/DFS based campus filesystem (yes, this is still
> in production here).
Hey, a fellow DFS shop :)... We finally migrated the last production files
off of DFS last
On 6-3-2010 18:41, Ralf Utermann wrote:
So from this site: we very much support the idea of adding ignore
and deny values for the aclmode property!
However, reading PSARC/2010/029, it looks like we will get
aclmode=discard for everybody and the property removed.
I hope this is not the end of the
we recently started to look at a ZFS based solution as a possible
replacement for our DCE/DFS based campus filesystem (yes, this is
still in production here). The ACL model of the combination
OpenSolaris+ZFS+in-kernel-CIFS+NFSv4 looks like a really
promising setup, something which could place it h
