Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS acl and chmod

2010-07-30 Thread Cindy Swearingen
I was mistaken below. I see that the ls -dv was issued from the 2 directory. We have no idea what's going on here. It works as expected in my tests. If you identify steps that lead up to this or can reproduce it and can provide the Solaris release, please let us know. Thanks, Cindy On 07/29/10

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS acl and chmod

2010-07-29 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hey Nix, I think I see the problem now. If you want to review the interaction of setting an explicit ACL and using the chmod 755 command on 2, you need this command: # ls -dv 2 What you have is this command: # ls -dv (I have no idea what's going on with the parent dir ACL.) I tested your sy

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS acl and chmod

2010-07-29 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Which Solaris release is this and are you using /usr/bin/ls and /usr/bin/chmod? Thanks, Cindy On 07/29/10 02:44, . . wrote: Hi , while playing with ZFS acls I have noticed chmod strange behavior, it duplicates some acls , is it a bug or a feature :) ? For example scenario: #ls -dv ./2 drwxr

[zfs-discuss] ZFS acl and chmod

2010-07-29 Thread . .
Hi , while playing with ZFS acls I have noticed chmod strange behavior, it duplicates some acls , is it a bug or a feature :) ? For example scenario: #ls -dv ./2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 2 Jul 29 11:22 2 0:owner@::deny 1:owner@:list_directory/read_data/add_file/write_data/a