The ZFS best practices is here:
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide
Run zpool scrub on a regular basis to identify data integrity problems.
If you have consumer-quality drives, consider a weekly scrubbing
schedule. If you have datacenter-quality drives, consid
Mohammed Sadiq wrote:
Hi
Is it recommended to do scrub while the filesystem is mounted . How
frequently do we have to do scrub and at what circumstances.
You can scrub while the filesystems are mounted - most people do,
there's no reason to unmount for for a scrub. (Scrub is pool level, not
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Mohammed Sadiq wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it recommended to do scrub while the filesystem is mounted .
yes
> How
> frequently do we have to do scrub and at what circumstances.
>
some people say weekly, some other monthly, some other, like myself,
whenever remember to. Us
Hi
Is it recommended to do scrub while the filesystem is mounted . How
frequently do we have to do scrub and at what circumstances.
Please suggest.
Thanks/Regards
Mohammed Sadiq
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opens
While using Solaris 10U4 with all patches applied, I notice that the
estimated time to complete a scrub is way off:
scrub in progress, 68.81% done, 0h7m to go
When it is about 50% done, the estimated time to complete is something
like 9 minutes when it really needs over 30 minutes more.
Does t
I am using b68 or b69 (can't remember) and the scrubs take forever. They never
finish.
It turned out to be a bug in this opensolaris version. I posted that question
here somewhere, and it was a confirmed bug.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
zfs-discuss] zfs scrub taking very very long
Insufficient data.
How big is the pool? How much stored?
Are the external drives all on the same USB bus?
I am switching to eSATA for my next external drive setup as both USB 2.0 and
firewire are just too fricking slow for the large drives these d
Insufficient data.
How big is the pool? How much stored?
Are the external drives all on the same USB bus?
I am switching to eSATA for my next external drive setup as both USB 2.0 and
firewire are just too fricking slow for the large drives these days.
This message posted from opensolaris.or
On 06 March, 2008 - Justin Vassallo sent me these 12K bytes:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I ran a zpool scrub on 2 zpools. one located on internal sas drives, the
> second on external, USB SATA drives.
>
>
>
> The internal pool finished scrubbing in no time, while the external pool is
> taking incredi
Hello,
I ran a zpool scrub on 2 zpools. one located on internal sas drives, the
second on external, USB SATA drives.
The internal pool finished scrubbing in no time, while the external pool is
taking incredibly long.
Typical data transfer rate to this external pool is 80MB/s.
Any he
We have noticed that each time we initiate a scrub on our zpool , one of
the newtwork interface (fge1) on our PP650 goes down.
(always that interface, all others are fine )
If we cancel the scrub , a simple ifconfig down and ifconfig up of the
interface fixes the problem !!!
When the interface go
Peter,
I'll first check /var/adm/messages to see if there are any poblems
with the following disks:
c10t600A0B800011730E66F444C5EE7Ed0
c10t600A0B800011730E66F644C5EE96d0
c10t600A0B800011652EE5CF44C5EEA7d0
c10t600A0B800011730E66F844C5EEBAd0
The checksum errors seems to concentrat
12 matches
Mail list logo
