On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Brian Kolaci wrote:
So if there is corruption, can it be safely isolated so as to not
affect other datasets or LDoms? Or would it be likely to take down
the whole pool?
It seems like you are asking if there could be a software bug or a
firmware/hardware bug in the SAN.
On Mar 2, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Brian Kolaci wrote:
>>
>> What is probability of corruption with ZFS in Solaris 10 U6 and up in a SAN
>> environment? Have people successfully recovered?
>
> The probability of corruption in a "SAN environment" depends
On Mar 2, 2010, at 7:08 AM, Brian Kolaci wrote:
> We have a virtualized environment of T-Series where each host has either
> zones or LDoms.
> All of the virtual systems will have their own dedicated storage on ZFS (and
> some may also get raw LUNs). All the SAN storage is delivered in fixed siz
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Brian Kolaci wrote:
What is probability of corruption with ZFS in Solaris 10 U6 and up in a SAN
environment? Have people successfully recovered?
The probability of corruption in a "SAN environment" depends entirely
on your SAN environment. With proper design, the probab
We have a virtualized environment of T-Series where each host has either zones
or LDoms.
All of the virtual systems will have their own dedicated storage on ZFS (and
some may also get raw LUNs). All the SAN storage is delivered in fixed sized
33GB LUNs.
The question I have to the community i
