Mikael Kjerrman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn't find a good answer
> searching the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things
> :)
>
> However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a
> vxfs filesystem in the
Orvar Korvar wrote:
> Ive heard it is hard to give an correct estimate of the used bytes in ZFS,
> because of this and that. It gives you only an approximate number. I think
> Ive read that in the ZFS administration guide somewhere in the "zpool
> status" or "zfs list" command?
That is not correct
Hi,
thanks for the reply. But there must be a better explanation other than that?
Otherwise it seems kinda harsh to "loose" 20GB per 1TB and I will most likely
have to answer this question when we are going to discuss if we are to migrate
to zfs over vxfs..
This message posted from opensola
Ive heard it is hard to give an correct estimate of the used bytes in ZFS,
because of this and that. It gives you only an approximate number. I think Ive
read that in the ZFS administration guide somewhere in the "zpool status" or
"zfs list" command?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Hi,
sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn't find a good answer searching
the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things :)
However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a
vxfs filesystem in the available size. ie.
ZFS
zonedata/zfs
