Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Richard Elling wrote:
If I wanted to swap between a 32GB SSD and a 1TB SATA drive, I guess I
would need to make a partition/slice on the TB drive of exactly the
size of the SSD?
Yes, but note that an SMI label hangs onto the outdated notion
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Richard Elling wrote:
> > If I wanted to swap between a 32GB SSD and a 1TB SATA drive, I guess I
> > would need to make a partition/slice on the TB drive of exactly the
> > size of the SSD?
>
> Yes, but note that an SMI label hangs onto the outdated notion of
> cylinders and y
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Richard Elling wrote:
I didn't find that exact part number, but I notice that manufacturing part
371-4196 32GB Solid State Drive, SATA Interface
is showing up in a number of systems. IIRC, this would be an Intel X25-E.
Hmm, the part numbe
On Wed, May 13 at 17:27, Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Richard Elling wrote:
Intel claims > 3,300 4kByte random write iops.
Is that before after the device gets full and starts needing to erase whole
pages to write new blocks 8-/?
The quoted numbers are minimums, not "up to" li
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Richard Elling wrote:
> I didn't find that exact part number, but I notice that manufacturing part
>371-4196 32GB Solid State Drive, SATA Interface
> is showing up in a number of systems. IIRC, this would be an Intel X25-E.
Hmm, the part number I provided was off an offi
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I see Sun has recently released part number XRA-ST1CH-32G2SSD, a 32GB SATA
SSD for the x4540 server.
I didn't find that exact part number, but I notice that manufacturing part
371-4196 32GB Solid State Drive, SATA Interface
is showing up in a number of systems. IIRC,
I see Sun has recently released part number XRA-ST1CH-32G2SSD, a 32GB SATA
SSD for the x4540 server.
We have five x4500's we purchased last year that we are deploying to
provide file and web services to our users. One issue that we have had is
horrible performance for the "single threaded process
