Do *NOT* install 127871-02 on a Solaris 10 system.
127871-02 is an immature Feature patch associated with Solaris 10 Update 5.
It's only purpose is for constructing pre-release "builds" of Solaris 10 Update
5 for internal Sun testing. It is *not* to be installed on pre-U5 systems.
127871-02 c
Still no news when a real patch will be released for this issue?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
We are having the same problem.
First with 125025-05 and then also with 125205-07
Solaris 10 update 4 - Know with all Patchesx
We opened a Case and got
T-PATCH 127871-02
we installed the Marvell Driver Binary 3 Days ago.
T127871-02/SUNWckr/reloc/kernel/misc/sata
T127871-02/SUNWmv88sx/reloc/ke
Peter Eriksson wrote:
> Speaking of error recovery due to bad blocks - anyone know if the SATA disks
> that are delivered with the Thumper have "enterprise" or "desktop"
> firmware/settings by default? If I'm not mistaken one of the differences is
> that the "enterrprise" variant more quickly gi
Speaking of error recovery due to bad blocks - anyone know if the SATA disks
that are delivered with the Thumper have "enterprise" or "desktop"
firmware/settings by default? If I'm not mistaken one of the differences is
that the "enterrprise" variant more quickly gives up with bad blocks and
re
The "reset: no matching NCQ I/O found" issue appears to be related to the
error recovery for bad blocks on the disk. In general it should be harmless,
but
I have looked into this. If there is someone out there who;
1) Is hitting this issue, and;
2) Is running recent Solaris Nevada bits (not Sola
On 11/13/07, Dan Poltawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just discovered patch 125205-07, which wasn't installed on our system
> because we don't have SUNWhea..
>
> Has anyone with problems tried this patch, and has it helped at all?
We were having a pretty rough time running S10U4. While I w
I've just discovered patch 125205-07, which wasn't installed on our system
because we don't have SUNWhea..
Has anyone with problems tried this patch, and has it helped at all?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
We too are seeing this problem on some of our Thumpers - the ones with U4
and/or all the latest patches installed. We have one which we stopped patching
before the kernel patch that introduced
this problem that works fine...
Works:
[0] andromeda:/<2>ncri86pc/sbin# uname -a
SunOS andromeda 5.10
That is interesting, again we're having the same problem with our X4500s.
I am trying to work out what is causing the problem with NFS, restarting the
service causes it to try and stop and not bring it back up.
Rebooting the whole box fails and it just hangs till a hard reset..
This message
We have this identical problem on all 10 or so of our thumpers. They're running
stock Solaris 10, whatever came with them. We think it's starting to cause
problems, as we will see a rash of those errors on one of our machines, and
then NFS will stop serving.
This message posted from opensola
Hi,
we have the same problem. Our X4500 has Solaris 10 11/06 and (nearly)
every kernel and driver related patch installed.
Nothing set in /etc/system
fmdump is not showing any errors
--
# fmdump
TIME UUID
I got it too. Its a brand new x4500 (my 2nd eval box after the other one use to
freeze up). I got this while running a java program that tries and reads a 128G
file while writing a 100G file in 2 threads with 128K blocks.
Oct 29 00:56:28 zeta1 marvell88sx: [ID 670675 kern.info] NOTICE: marvell88
Stuart Anderson wrote:
> After applying 125205-07 on two X4500 machines running Sol10U4 and
> removing "set sata:sata_func_enable = 0x5" from /etc/system to
> re-enable NCQ, I am again observing drive disconnect error messages.
> This in spite of the patch description which claims multiple fixes
>
After applying 125205-07 on two X4500 machines running Sol10U4 and
removing "set sata:sata_func_enable = 0x5" from /etc/system to
re-enable NCQ, I am again observing drive disconnect error messages.
This in spite of the patch description which claims multiple fixes
in this area:
6587133 repeated D
15 matches
Mail list logo
