On 25-Jan-07, at 5:09 AM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On January 23, 2007 8:11:24 PM -0200 Toby Thain
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Still, would be nice for those of us who bought them. And judging by
other posts on this thread it seems just about everyone assumes
hotswap
"just works".
hot *plug* :
On January 23, 2007 8:11:24 PM -0200 Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Still, would be nice for those of us who bought them. And judging by
other posts on this thread it seems just about everyone assumes hotswap
"just works".
hot *plug* :-)
-frank
__
Frank Cusack wrote:
It's interesting the topics that come up here, which really have little to
do with zfs. I guess it just shows how great zfs is. I mean, you would
never have a ufs list that talked about the merits of sata vs sas and what
hardware do i buy. Also interesting is that zfs expos
It's interesting the topics that come up here, which really have little to
do with zfs. I guess it just shows how great zfs is. I mean, you would
never have a ufs list that talked about the merits of sata vs sas and what
hardware do i buy. Also interesting is that zfs exposes hardware bugs
yet
On 23-Jan-07, at 4:51 PM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
Frank Cusack wrote:
yes I am an experienced Solaris admin and know all about devfsadm :-)
and the older disks command.
It doesn't help in this case. I think it's a BIOS thing. Linux and
Windows can't see IDE drives that aren't there at boot tim
