Re: [zfs-discuss] Windows XP nfs client poor performance

2008-10-27 Thread Tom Buskey
I've found that SFU NFS is pretty poor in general. I setup Samba on the host system. Let the client stay native & have the server adapt. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.op

Re: [zfs-discuss] Windows XP nfs client poor performance

2008-10-20 Thread Brent Jones
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Bob Bencze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings. > I have a X4500 with an 8TB RAIDZ datapool, currently 75% full. I have it > carved up into several filesystems. I share out two of the filesystems > /datapool/data4 (approx 1.5TB) and /datapool/data5 (approx 3.

Re: [zfs-discuss] Windows XP nfs client poor performance

2008-10-20 Thread Ross
I've had serious problems trying to get Windows to run as a NFS server with SFU. On a modern raid array I can't get it above 4MB/s transfer rates. It's slow enough that virtual machines running off it time out almost every time I try to boot them. Oddly it worked ok when I used an old IDE dis

[zfs-discuss] Windows XP nfs client poor performance

2008-10-20 Thread Bob Bencze
Greetings. I have a X4500 with an 8TB RAIDZ datapool, currently 75% full. I have it carved up into several filesystems. I share out two of the filesystems /datapool/data4 (approx 1.5TB) and /datapool/data5 (approx 3.5TB). THe data is imagery, and the primary application on the PCs is Socetset.