Miles,
>> "mb" == Matt Beebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>mb> When using AVS's "Async replication with memory queue", am I
>mb> guaranteed a consistent ZFS on the distant end? The assumed
>mb> failure case is that the replication broke, and now I'm trying
>mb> to promote the
> "mb" == Matt Beebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mb> When using AVS's "Async replication with memory queue", am I
mb> guaranteed a consistent ZFS on the distant end? The assumed
mb> failure case is that the replication broke, and now I'm trying
mb> to promote the secondary rep
When using AVS's "Async replication with memory queue", am I guaranteed a
consistent ZFS on the distant end?
The assumed failure case is that the replication broke, and now I'm trying to
promote the secondary replicate with what might be stale data. Recognizing in
advance that some of the data
