On Fri, August 21, 2009 11:18, David Magda wrote:
> The current default value ignores flush requests from guest OSes, but this
> can't tweaked via a parameter (11.1.3 Responding to guest IDE flush
> requests):
s/can't/can be/
___
zfs-discuss mailing li
On Fri, August 21, 2009 10:32, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Various people have stated here that VirtualBox intentionally does not
> pass through cache flush requests.
The current default value ignores flush requests from guest OSes, but this
can't tweaked via a parameter (11.1.3 Responding to guest
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Johan Eliasson wrote:
So a full NTFS defrag should result in just a long sequential ZFS write?
That would depend on how the defrag algorithm works, how often NTFS
issues a synchronous write request (cache flush), how much memory is
installed on your Solaris system, and h
So a full NTFS defrag should result in just a long sequential ZFS write?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Johan Eliasson wrote:
Thinking about running a WinXP instance in VirtualBox on
OpenSolaris, using a 20 GB harddisk-file. However, I am worried
about fragmentation... with the constant reading/writing that WinXP
does... will not the fragmentation of the hardrive-file in ZFS
Hi folks!
Thinking about running a WinXP instance in VirtualBox on OpenSolaris, using a
20 GB harddisk-file. However, I am worried about fragmentation... with the
constant reading/writing that WinXP does... will not the fragmentation of the
hardrive-file in ZFS be humongus??
Best regards, gigan
