On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:26 PM, Khushil Dep wrote:
> Could you not also pin process' to cores, preventing switching should help
> too? I've done this for performance reasons before on a 24 core Linux box
>
Yes. More importantly, you could send interrupts to a processor set. There are
many
ways to
Could you not also pin process' to cores, preventing switching should help
too? I've done this for performance reasons before on a 24 core Linux box
Sent from my HTC Desire
On 16 Feb 2011 05:12, "Richard Elling" wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2011, at 7:46 PM, ian W wrote:
>
>> Thanks..
>>
>> given this box
On Feb 15, 2011, at 7:46 PM, ian W wrote:
> Thanks..
>
> given this box runs 18 hours a day and is idle for maybe 17.5 hrs of that,
> I'd rather have the best power management I can...
>
> I would have loved to have upgraded to a i3 or even SB but the solaris 11
> express support for both is m
Thanks..
given this box runs 18 hours a day and is idle for maybe 17.5 hrs of that, I'd
rather have the best power management I can...
I would have loved to have upgraded to a i3 or even SB but the solaris 11
express support for both is marginal. (h55 chipset issues, no sandybridge
support at
On Feb 14, 2011, at 4:49 PM, ian W wrote:
> Hello
>
> my power.conf is as follows; any recommendations for improvement?
For best performance, disable power management. For certain processors
and BIOSes, some combinations of power management (below the OS) are
also known to be toxic. At Nexenta,
Hello
my power.conf is as follows; any recommendations for improvement?
device-dependency-property removable-media /dev/fb
autopm enable
autoS3 enable
cpu-threshold 1s
# Auto-Shutdown Idle(min) Start/Finish(hh:mm) Behavior
autoshutdown 30 0:00 0:00 noshutdown
S3-support enable
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:14 AM, ian W wrote:
> Thanks for the responses.. I found the issue. It was due to power management,
> and a probably bug with event driven power management states,
>
> changing
>
> cpupm enable
>
> to
>
> cpupm enable poll-mode
>
> in /etc/power.conf fixed the issue for
Thanks for the responses.. I found the issue. It was due to power management,
and a probably bug with event driven power management states,
changing
cpupm enable
to
cpupm enable poll-mode
in /etc/power.conf fixed the issue for me. back up to 110MB/sec+ now..
--
This message posted from op
> > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey
> >
> > What does "zpool status" tell you?
>
> Also, "zpool iostat 5'
Sorry - check iostat -en
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 975426
> > What does "zpool status" tell you?
>
> Also, "zpool iostat 5'
or even iostat -xn
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er
et
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey
>
> What does "zpool status" tell you?
Also, "zpool iostat 5'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mai
> On the other hand, that will only matter for reads. And the complaint is
> writes.
Actually, it also affects writes. (due checksum reads?)
Yours
Markus Kovero
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailm
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of ian W
>
> Hope you can still help here. Solaris 11 Express.
> x86 platform E6600 with 6GB of RAM
>
> I have a fairly new S11E box Im using as a file server.
> 3x1.5TB HDD's in a raidz pool.
J
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Markus Kovero
>
> > I noticed recently that write rate has dropped off and through testing
now I
> am getting 35MB/sec writes. The pool is around 50-60% full.
>
> Hi, do you have your zfs pref
> I noticed recently that write rate has dropped off and through testing now I
> am getting 35MB/sec writes. The pool is around 50-60% full.
> I am getting a CONSTANT 30-35% kernel cpu utilisation, even if the machine is
> idle. I do not know if this was the case when the write performance was
Hi All.
Hope you can still help here. Solaris 11 Express.
x86 platform E6600 with 6GB of RAM
I have a fairly new S11E box Im using as a file server.
3x1.5TB HDD's in a raidz pool.
When I first set it up I was getting 110MB/sec writes across gigabit network
via SMB shares.
I noticed recently th
16 matches
Mail list logo
