Re: [zfs-discuss] User quotas. A recurring question

2006-11-02 Thread Robert Petkus
Roch - PAE wrote: > Chris Gerhard writes: > > > One question that keeps coming up in my discussions about ZFS is the lack > of user quotas. > > > > Typically this comes from people who have many tens of thousands > > (30,000 - 100,000) of users where they feel that having a file system > >

Re: [zfs-discuss] User quotas. A recurring question

2006-11-02 Thread Roch - PAE
Chris Gerhard writes: > One question that keeps coming up in my discussions about ZFS is the lack of > user quotas. > > Typically this comes from people who have many tens of thousands > (30,000 - 100,000) of users where they feel that having a file system > per user will not be manageab

Re: [zfs-discuss] User quotas. A recurring question

2006-11-02 Thread Darren J Moffat
Chris Gerhard wrote: One question that keeps coming up in my discussions about ZFS is the lack of user quotas. Typically this comes from people who have many tens of thousands (30,000 - 100,000) of users where they feel that having a file system per user will not be manageable. I would agree

[zfs-discuss] User quotas. A recurring question

2006-11-01 Thread Chris Gerhard
One question that keeps coming up in my discussions about ZFS is the lack of user quotas. Typically this comes from people who have many tens of thousands (30,000 - 100,000) of users where they feel that having a file system per user will not be manageable. I would agree that today that is the