Re: [zfs-discuss] The ZFS MOS and how DNODES are stored

2007-02-07 Thread Darren Dunham
> ZFS documentation lists snapshot limits on any single file system in a > pool at 2**48 snaps, and that seems to logically imply that a snap on > a file system does not require an update to the pool’s > currently active uberblock. All commited changes (including snapshot creation) require a new

[zfs-discuss] The ZFS MOS and how DNODES are stored

2007-02-06 Thread Bill Moloney
ZFS documentation lists snapshot limits on any single file system in a pool at 2**48 snaps, and that seems to logically imply that a snap on a file system does not require an update to the pool’s currently active uberblock. That is to say, that if we take a snapshot of a file system in a pool,